Re: Define DatumGetInt8 function.

From: Chao Li <li(dot)evan(dot)chao(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Kirill Reshke <reshkekirill(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Define DatumGetInt8 function.
Date: 2025-12-29 11:08:25
Message-ID: 225E9E96-D160-49CD-97CA-A9AE20B60A8B@gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> On Dec 29, 2025, at 19:02, Kirill Reshke <reshkekirill(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Hi hackers!
>
> I am currently involved in the Cloudberry kernel rebase process[0]. We
> are rebasing [0] which is based on pg-14 on pg-16 kernel. During this
> process I noticed rebase conflicts introduced by c8b2ef0. This commit
> defines a number of include functions for datum conversion.
>
> During this rebase resolution, I noticed that there is an Int8GetDatum
> function, but there is no DatumGetInt8, which I want to use. All other
> inline functions seem to be provided in pairs by postgres.h. So it
> looks convenient to define DatumGetInt8 in postgres.h?
>
> FPA doing just that.
>
>
> [0] https://github.com/apache/cloudberry
>
> --
> Best regards,
> Kirill Reshke
> <v1-0001-Define-DatumGetInt8-function.patch>

LGTM.

Best regards,
--
Chao Li (Evan)
HighGo Software Co., Ltd.
https://www.highgo.com/

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message vignesh C 2025-12-29 11:10:46 Re: [Proposal] Adding Log File Capability to pg_createsubscriber
Previous Message Kirill Reshke 2025-12-29 11:02:34 Define DatumGetInt8 function.