Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [PATCHES] Backend SSL configuration enhancement

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, "Victor B(dot) Wagner" <vitus(at)cryptocom(dot)ru>
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Backend SSL configuration enhancement
Date: 2006-08-31 18:36:28
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-patches
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> In that case I'd expect to edit some central openssl configuration file to 
> turn off the offending methods in one central place.

I concur with this in the abstract: it would be better design to submit
something to the OpenSSL project to allow setting engine choices and
such site-wide.  In the short term, though, it's hard to deny that our

    if (SSL_CTX_set_cipher_list(SSL_context, "ALL:!ADH:!LOW:!EXP:!MD5:@STRENGTH") != 1)

is pretty ad-hoc and looks exactly like the sort of thing someone might
want to adjust.  I'm willing to accept the part of the patch that makes
that string into a GUC variable, until such time as OpenSSL provides a
way to configure itself site-wide so that we can remove this code
entirely.  I'm not eager to accept the other part of the patch.

			regards, tom lane

In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Josh BerkusDate: 2006-08-31 18:41:41
Subject: Re: Thought provoking piece on NetBSD
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2006-08-31 18:36:12
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Thought provoking piece on NetBSD

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2006-08-31 18:45:49
Subject: Re: BUG #2600: dblink compile with SSL missing libraries
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2006-08-31 18:29:46
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Interval aggregate regression failure

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group