Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Adding Reply-To: <listname> to Lists configuration ...

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Adding Reply-To: <listname> to Lists configuration ...
Date: 2004-11-28 23:58:16
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-generalpgsql-hackers
"Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org> writes:
> What is the general opinion of this?  I'd like to implement it, but not so 
> much so that I'm going to beat my head against a brick wall on it ...

I think we've discussed this in the past, and the consensus has always
been that more people like it as-is than want to change it.  I'm
certainly in the leave-it-as-is camp.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Simon RiggsDate: 2004-11-29 00:03:19
Subject: Re: Stopgap solution for table-size-estimate updating
Previous:From: Neil ConwayDate: 2004-11-28 23:46:15
Subject: Re: psql and schemas

pgsql-general by date

Next:From: Christopher BrowneDate: 2004-11-29 01:24:25
Subject: Re: PGSQL: The Gateway will be kept.
Previous:From: Marc G. FournierDate: 2004-11-28 23:34:28
Subject: Adding Reply-To: <listname> to Lists configuration ...

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group