Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Proof of concept: auto updatable views

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Proof of concept: auto updatable views
Date: 2012-07-02 20:34:05
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Sun, Jul 1, 2012 at 6:35 PM, Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> Basically what it does is this: in the first stage of query rewriting,
>> just after any non-SELECT rules are applied, the new code kicks in -
>> if the target relation is a view, and there were no unqualified
>> INSTEAD rules, and there are no INSTEAD OF triggers, it tests if ...

>> The consensus last time seemed to be that backwards compatibility
>> should be offered through a new GUC variable to allow this feature to
>> be disabled globally, which I've not implemented yet.

> I think the backward-compatibility concerns with this approach would
> be much less than with the previously-proposed approach, so I'm not
> 100% sure we need a backward compatibility knob.

If the above description is correct, the behavior is changed only in
cases that previously threw errors, so I tend to agree that no
"backwards compatibility knob" is needed.

			regards, tom lane

In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Robert HaasDate: 2012-07-02 20:34:11
Subject: Re: Event Triggers reduced, v1
Previous:From: Alexander KorotkovDate: 2012-07-02 20:33:11
Subject: Re: Patch: add conversion from pg_wchar to multibyte

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2018 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group