Re: Slow planning time for simple query

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Jeremy Finzel <finzelj(at)gmail(dot)com>, Postgres General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Slow planning time for simple query
Date: 2018-06-06 19:10:05
Message-ID: 22136.1528312205@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> 2018-06-06 18:59 GMT+02:00 Jeremy Finzel <finzelj(at)gmail(dot)com>:
>> We have an odd scenario on one of our OLTP systems, which behaves the same
>> way on a streamer, of a 700-1000ms planning time for a query like this:
>> SELECT *
>> FROM table1
>> WHERE source_id IN (SELECT id FROM table2 WHERE customer_id = $1);

> more times I seen similar issue based on bloated indexes on table - pg in
> planning time detect min max from possible indexes

Oh, hmm, yeah it could be ye olde get_actual_variable_range() issue.
When this happens, are there perhaps a lot of recently-dead rows at either
extreme of the range of table1.source_id or table2.id?

We made a fix last year to improve that:
https://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=postgresql.git&a=commitdiff&h=3ca930fc3
but it wasn't back-patched.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Kellerer 2018-06-06 19:12:34 Re: Using distinct in an aggregate prevents parallel execution?
Previous Message Pavel Stehule 2018-06-06 18:52:02 Re: Slow planning time for simple query