Re: pgsql: Add C comment about why we send cache invalidation messages for

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-committers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pgsql: Add C comment about why we send cache invalidation messages for
Date: 2011-09-06 21:07:56
Message-ID: 21932.1315343276@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committers

Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> This comment seems inaccurate and bizarrely placed. What question
>> were you trying to answer?

> It was in response to my email where I asked why we are sending cache
> invalidation messages for temporary tables that can't be seen by any
> other backends:
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2011-03/msg00844.php

Oh. OK, I cleaned it up a bit.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-committers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2011-09-06 21:19:02 Re: pgsql: Add C comment about why we send cache invalidation messages for
Previous Message Tom Lane 2011-09-06 21:07:13 pgsql: Improve comment about handling of temp tables in shared-inval co