|From:||Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>|
|Cc:||Nathan Boley <npboley(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, James Pye <lists(at)jwp(dot)name>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org|
|Subject:||Re: Python 3.1 support|
|Views:||Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email|
"Joshua D. Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> On Wed, 2009-11-18 at 12:06 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Yes. That's exactly what I was complaining about upthread. I'm not
>> a Python user, but from what I can gather of the 2-to-3 changes,
>> having to choose one at package build time is going to be a disaster.
> Agreed. We really need to have a plpython and plpython3.
Peter was concerned about duplicative maintenance effort, but what I
think this patch shows is that (at least for the near future) both
could be built from a single source file. What we need is configure
and makefile support to do that.
regards, tom lane
|Next Message||Joshua D. Drake||2009-11-18 17:48:31||Re: Python 3.1 support|
|Previous Message||Tom Lane||2009-11-18 17:23:28||Re: Patch - Reference Function Parameters by Name|