|From:||Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>|
|Subject:||timestamp subtraction (was Re: formatting intervals with to_char)|
|Views:||Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email|
Graham Davis <gdavis(at)refractions(dot)net> writes:
> The documentation for to_char states that:
> "|to_char(interval)| formats HH and HH12 as hours in a single day, while
> HH24 can output hours exceeding a single day, e.g. >24."
> However I can not get it to work with time intervals that span more than
> 1 day.
Well, it does in fact print intervals exceeding 24 hours:
regression=# select to_char('48 hours'::interval, 'HH24:MI:SS');
However, '48 hours' and '2 days' are not the same thing. The problem
with the case you give is really that timestamp_mi applies justify_hours
to its result --- that is,
regression=# select ('2006-09-15 23:59:00'::timestamp - '2006-09-01 09:30:41'::timestamp);
14 days 14:28:19
should be reporting '350:28:19' instead.
This is a hack that was done to minimize the changes in the regression
test expected outputs when we changed type interval from months/seconds
to months/days/seconds. But I wonder whether it wasn't a dumb idea.
It is certainly inconsistent, as noted in the code comments.
I'm tempted to propose that we remove the justify_hours call, and tell
anyone who really wants the old results to apply justify_hours() to the
subtraction result for themselves. Not sure what the fallout would be,
regards, tom lane
|Next Message||Luke Lonergan||2006-10-05 16:52:33||Re: Query Failed, out of memory|
|Previous Message||Andrew Dunstan||2006-10-05 16:49:59||Re: Query Failed, out of memory|
|Next Message||Martin Marques||2006-10-05 18:27:46||age() vs. timestamp substraction|
|Previous Message||Andrew Sullivan||2006-10-05 15:29:52||Re: i have table|