Re: Inefficient query plan

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Jann Röder <roederja(at)ethz(dot)ch>, pgsql-performance <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Inefficient query plan
Date: 2010-08-23 15:20:55
Message-ID: 21464.1282576855@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> Hmm, I'm placing bets on the bpchar weirdness. I'd try getting rid of
> that and using plain varchar for all the columns.

That's certainly what's inhibiting it from considering an indexscan
on the larger table. I'm not as convinced as the OP that a nestloop
indexscan is really going to win compared to the hash plan, but if
the comparison value is varchar then an index on a bpchar column
is simply not useful --- at least not unless you stick an explicit
cast into the query, so that the comparison will have bpchar rather
than varchar semantics.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message gnuoytr 2010-08-23 15:22:46 Re: Inefficient query plan
Previous Message Kevin Grittner 2010-08-23 15:03:11 Re: Inefficient query plan