"Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov> writes:
> On Mon, Sep 17, 2007 at 2:49 AM, in message
> <1190015368(dot)148293(dot)56830(at)y42g2000hsy(dot)googlegroups(dot)com>, valgog
> <valgog(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:=20
>> Are you sure you understood what was the question?
>> Is the TBL1.CATEGORY = TBL2.CATEGORY the same as TBL1.CATEGORY &
>> TBL2.CATEGORY > 0?
> Yes, given that he stipulated that one and only one bit would be set.
Really? In that case, isn't this bit-field just a bad implementation of
an enum-style field?
regards, tom lane
In response to
pgsql-performance by date
|Next:||From: Kevin Grittner||Date: 2007-09-17 14:30:26|
|Subject: Re: Index usage when bitwise operator is used|
|Previous:||From: Decibel!||Date: 2007-09-17 12:27:39|
|Subject: Re: [Again] Postgres performance problem|