| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers-win32 <pgsql-hackers-win32(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: pg_ctl vs. Windows locking |
| Date: | 2004-06-18 16:18:21 |
| Message-ID: | 21345.1087575501@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers-win32 |
Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>>> Right, we can just close the pipe. I was thinking of adding another
>>> signal but that's obviously easier. Will work on making this happen.
>>
>> ... except there is no postmaster pipe anymore --- back to plan A.
> Did we get a resolution on this?
Yes, I committed the change several days ago. The pgstat processes are
told to shut down at the same time the shutdown checkpoint starts.
I didn't actually make the postmaster wait for them, but I'd think that
under normal circumstances the shutdown checkpoint will take longer.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andreas Pflug | 2004-06-19 20:10:10 | Re: Compiling libpq with VisualC |
| Previous Message | Merlin Moncure | 2004-06-17 20:58:12 | PostgreSQL SCM |