| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Connection Pools and DISCARD ALL |
| Date: | 2007-10-04 21:08:29 |
| Message-ID: | 21198.1191532109@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> Could we maybe have some flavor of ROLLBACK that doesn't issue a warning
> if no transaction is in progress? There is precedent for this sort of
> facility - DROP ... IF EXISTS.
Something that would actually be doable for 8.3 would be to downgrade
this particular WARNING to a NOTICE. A DBA who hasn't got
log_min_messages set higher than NOTICE hasn't really got a lot of room
to whine about bulky logs.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2007-10-04 21:33:42 | Re: First steps with 8.3 and autovacuum launcher |
| Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2007-10-04 21:03:36 | ecpg build now breaks mingw |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Euler Taveira de Oliveira | 2007-10-07 22:47:06 | pt_BR FAQ update |
| Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2007-10-04 20:27:06 | Re: Connection Pools and DISCARD ALL |