Re: Rename max_parallel_degree?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Josh berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Rename max_parallel_degree?
Date: 2016-05-31 18:00:25
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

I wrote:
> I really think that a GUC named "max_parallel_workers", which in fact
> limits the number of workers and not something else, is the way to go.

To be concrete, I suggest comparing the attached documentation patch
with Robert's. Which one is more understandable?

(I have not bothered preparing code changes to go with this, but am
willing to do so.)

regards, tom lane

Attachment Content-Type Size
rename-max-parallel-degree-docs-only.patch text/x-diff 4.6 KB

In response to


Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh berkus 2016-05-31 18:02:54 Re: Rename max_parallel_degree?
Previous Message Peter Geoghegan 2016-05-31 17:51:28 Re: Rename max_parallel_degree?