Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] Missing array support

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>
Cc: "Patches (PostgreSQL)" <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Missing array support
Date: 2003-07-01 00:49:42
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-patches
Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> writes:
> One note; this change
>> ! get_fn_expr_rettype(FunctionCallInfo fcinfo)
>> to
>> ! get_fn_expr_rettype(FmgrInfo *flinfo)

> is a good example why some things, particularly PLs, are better off 
> being in the main source tree rather than on gborg (or someplace else). 
> PL/R uses get_fn_expr_rettype() and get_fn_expr_argtype(), so it's now 
> broken as of CVS tip :(

Sorry about that.  I suspected you had some calls I didn't know about,
but there wasn't much I could do about 'em; and I wanted to correct the
function signatures before anything else started to depend on them.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Rod TaylorDate: 2003-07-01 01:09:52
Subject: INDEX_MAX_KEYS to 64?
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2003-07-01 00:44:59
Subject: Re: Dllist public/private part

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Jon JensenDate: 2003-07-01 01:10:08
Subject: Typo in backend/libpq/be-secure.c
Previous:From: Joe ConwayDate: 2003-07-01 00:37:02
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Missing array support

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group