| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Gregory Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu> |
| Cc: | "Sergey E(dot) Koposov" <math(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)ru>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: patch implementing the multi-argument aggregates (SOC project) |
| Date: | 2006-07-26 15:16:29 |
| Message-ID: | 2099.1153926989@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Gregory Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu> writes:
> Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
>> This patch is nowhere near ready for submission :-(. Most of the
>> comments seem to be "I don't know what to do here" ...
> Just to be clear, I think what Tom's saying it's not ready to be *applied*.
> Sending patches to this list early and often during development is generally
> encouraged.
Indeed, but if that was the point we should have been seeing drafts of
this patch long ago. I interpreted Sergey's submission as "getting this
in before feature freeze", and in that context the bar is higher. If a
patch isn't pretty nearly ready to be applied when the freeze deadline
arrives, we won't wait around for it.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Martijn van Oosterhout | 2006-07-26 15:29:27 | Re: Refactoring the API for amgetmulti |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2006-07-26 15:07:06 | Re: xlogdump behaviour translating dropped relations |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2006-07-26 15:29:51 | Re: [HACKERS] Resurrecting per-page cleaner for btree |
| Previous Message | Gregory Stark | 2006-07-26 15:04:30 | Re: Resurrecting per-page cleaner for btree |