Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: .cvsignore update...

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Sean Chittenden <sean(at)chittenden(dot)org>
Cc: PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: .cvsignore update...
Date: 2004-05-26 21:00:34
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-patches
Sean Chittenden <sean(at)chittenden(dot)org> writes:
> The attached patch either updates (in a 
> few few cases) or adds .cvsignore files.

I don't believe we need any of these.  The current set is sufficient to
prevent any CVS complaints in a "make distclean"'d tree, and that is the
way it should be.  Extra .cvsignores are dangerous IMHO.

If you like to live dangerously and not make distclean before you cvs
update, then use a vpath build (separate build tree).  There's no reason
to have to maintain a large set of .cvsignore files.

			regards, tom lane

In response to


pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Gaetano MendolaDate: 2004-05-26 21:01:06
Subject: Re: pg_ctl.c
Previous:From: Sean ChittendenDate: 2004-05-26 20:42:49
Subject: .cvsignore update...

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group