Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Some editing of docs for create index concurrently

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Some editing of docs for create index concurrently
Date: 2006-09-13 23:44:04
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-patches
Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
> The references to data warehousing and large tables were bothering me since --
> while true -- it's not really the main use case for CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY.
> Really it's OLTP systems that may or may not have large tables but regardless
> cannot stand the downtime caused by locks.

Applied with a bit of additional wordsmithing.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2006-09-14 01:45:35
Subject: Re: CSStorm occurred again by postgreSQL8.2
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2006-09-13 18:07:38
Subject: Re: - Proposal for repreparing prepared statements

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group