Re: YAML Was: CommitFest status/management

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Takahiro Itagaki <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine(at)hi-media(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Ron Mayer <rm_pg(at)cheapcomplexdevices(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: YAML Was: CommitFest status/management
Date: 2009-12-09 03:45:31
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> To be clear about which version we're talking about:
> is the candidate for commit that includes the cleanup you've already done.

I suppose this is subject to the same auto_explain problem already
noticed for JSON, but I would suggest that we commit this first and
then fix both together, rather than create merge issues.

regards, tom lane

In response to


Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tatsuo Ishii 2009-12-09 03:48:34 Re: [PATCH] Windows x64 [repost]
Previous Message Greg Smith 2009-12-09 03:44:33 Re: [patch] pg_ctl init extension