| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Sigh ... |
| Date: | 2008-05-02 19:44:13 |
| Message-ID: | 20832.1209757453@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Well, maybe the right answer is to take a step back and figure out what
>> pg_config.h.win32's excuse for living is at all.
> Oops, the file is only used by MSVC/BCC, not by MinGW. Sorry for the
> mistake about that.
Well, I'm still wondering why it is an input for MSVC. If we have a
configure substitute for MSVC, why isn't it working off pg_config.h.in?
The original idea of pg_config.h.win32 was to support the pre-8.0
method for building native libpq.dll. I'd like to see us obsolete that
method altogether and get rid of pg_config.h.win32.
> However, all the values are hardcoded, so nothing in it should relate to
> settings that come from configure, I believe. These should be dealt with
> in src/tools/msvc/Solution.pm (mostly in GenerateFiles() ).
FYI, I'm about to commit changes moving XLOG_BLCKSZ and XLOG_SEG_SIZE
into the domain of configurable stuff, too.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2008-05-02 19:50:44 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Sigh ... |
| Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2008-05-02 19:27:05 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Sigh ... |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2008-05-02 19:50:44 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Sigh ... |
| Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2008-05-02 19:27:05 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Sigh ... |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2008-05-02 19:50:44 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Sigh ... |
| Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2008-05-02 19:27:05 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Sigh ... |