| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-documentation <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Mention pg_dump version portability |
| Date: | 2006-05-17 16:13:49 |
| Message-ID: | 20775.1147882429@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-docs pgsql-hackers |
"Jim C. Nasby" <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org> writes:
> pg_dump -Fc | pg_restore will only match the output of pg_dump if
> everything's the same version though, right? Or wrong? What happens if
> pg_dump -Fc is and older version and pg_restore is the current version?
There would probably be some small differences, but 99% of pg_restore's
output is just regurgitating SQL it finds in the dump file.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jim C. Nasby | 2006-05-17 20:58:45 | Cross-version dumps (was: [DOCS] Mention pg_dump version portability) |
| Previous Message | Jim C. Nasby | 2006-05-17 15:41:20 | Re: Mention pg_dump version portability |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Rod Taylor | 2006-05-17 16:16:13 | Re: Compression and on-disk sorting |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2006-05-17 16:12:47 | Re: [GENERAL] Querying libpq compile time options |