| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "ITAGAKI Takahiro" <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org, "Alvaro Herrera" <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Logging conflicted queries on deadlocks |
| Date: | 2008-03-22 04:22:49 |
| Message-ID: | 20558.1206159769@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
> "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
>> One thing that I worried about for a little bit is that you can imagine
>> privilege-escalation scenarios.
> Perhaps we should only do this if the current user's ID is the same as the
> outermost session user's ID?
A conservative approach would be to report the query texts *only* in the
server log and never to the client --- this would need a bit of klugery
but seems doable.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | NikhilS | 2008-03-22 05:19:01 | Re: Auto Partitioning Patch - WIP version 1 |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2008-03-22 04:08:51 | Re: Logging conflicted queries on deadlocks |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | NikhilS | 2008-03-22 05:19:01 | Re: Auto Partitioning Patch - WIP version 1 |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2008-03-22 04:08:51 | Re: Logging conflicted queries on deadlocks |