Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> On 12/03/2012 02:46 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I see this too. Given that I want to wrap the back branches in a few
>> minutes, please revert at least in the back branches. I can't wait
>> for you to sort this out.
> OK. I reverted the lot.
Thanks, appreciate it. I'll help look into the problem late tonight,
if it's not sorted by then, but I have no time right now ...
regards, tom lane
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Bruce Momjian||Date: 2012-12-03 21:01:45|
|Subject: Re: --single-transaction hack to pg_upgrade does not work|
|Previous:||From: Andrew Dunstan||Date: 2012-12-03 20:05:27|
|Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Add mode where contrib installcheck runs
each module in a separa|
pgsql-committers by date
|Next:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2012-12-03 20:16:40|
|Subject: pgsql: Stamp 9.2.2.|
|Previous:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2012-12-03 20:10:47|
|Subject: pgsql: Update release notes for 9.2.2, 9.1.7, 9.0.11, 8.4.15, 8.3.22.|