Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
> "Martijn van Oosterhout" <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> writes:
>> Will this change break my code?
> Well, DBI already has to deal with this anyways because it tries to provide a
> database-independent interface. So you can instruct DBI to upcase, downcase,
> or leave the identifiers as the database provides them by setting this
> property on your database connection:
That's not a solution, that's a kluge with very obvious failure modes.
Now admittedly it's probably not *likely* that someone would use
identifiers differing only in case in a single table definition.
But it's legal, and in fact we're required by spec to support it.
regards, tom lane
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Gurjeet Singh||Date: 2008-03-28 01:48:41|
|Subject: Re: pg_standby for 8.2 (with last restart point)|
|Previous:||From: Aidan Van Dyk||Date: 2008-03-27 23:53:18|
|Subject: Re: Status of GIT mirror (Was having problem in rsync'ing cvs)|