| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Jeff Frost <jeff(at)frostconsultingllc(dot)com>, Richard Huxton <dev(at)archonet(dot)com>, pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Proposed doc-patch: Identifying the Current WAL file |
| Date: | 2006-04-15 17:57:43 |
| Message-ID: | 20274.1145123863@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-docs pgsql-patches |
Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> Also, what happens if the log switch happens, and some data change is
> written to the new WAL file in the first second, but nothing happens to
> the database after that for a minute? Your test would still show the
> old log file.
You seem to be assuming that ls will sort on the basis of the truncated
mtime that it displays, which is not the actual behavior of ls AFAIK.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2006-04-15 18:09:06 | Re: Proposed doc-patch: Identifying the Current WAL file |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2006-04-15 17:56:32 | Re: Proposed doc-patch: Identifying the Current WAL file |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2006-04-15 18:08:45 | Re: [PATCH] Reduce noise from tsort |
| Previous Message | Martijn van Oosterhout | 2006-04-15 17:57:20 | Re: [PATCH] Reduce noise from tsort |