Re: JIT works only partially with meson build?

From: Yugo Nagata <nagata(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>
Cc: David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: JIT works only partially with meson build?
Date: 2026-07-27 05:36:02
Message-ID: 20260727143602.fe90eac5cc635b6d26888b7e@sraoss.co.jp
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, 01 Oct 2025 15:25:51 +0200
Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at> wrote:

> On Tue, 2025-09-30 at 22:31 +0900, Yugo Nagata wrote:
> > > You used the <option> tag, which I believe is correct, but the surrounding
> > > code uses <literal>. I don't think it renders differently, but I think it
> > > would be good to use the same tag. I suggest that you change the
> > > surrounding code to use <option> as well.
> >
> > Agreed. I fixed it to use <option>, as well as in other place where I think
> > <option> is appropriate. Please find the attached patch.

I'm just resending the same patch because CommitFest reports that it needs a
rebase, although it still applies cleanly.

Regards,
Yugo Nagata

>
> I'll mark it "eeady for committer". A committer can decide whether to apply
> this to HEAD or not. I probably would, and revert it if PostgreSQL + Meson +
> Windows learns to produce bitcode.
>
> Yours,
> Laurenz Albe

--
Yugo Nagata <nagata(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp>

Attachment Content-Type Size
v2_fix_doc_jit_meson.patch text/x-diff 1.8 KB

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu) 2026-07-27 05:54:28 RE: Patch for migration of the pg_commit_ts directory
Previous Message Amit Kapila 2026-07-27 05:26:31 Re: sequencesync worker race with REFRESH SEQUENCES