| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Antonin Houska <ah(at)cybertec(dot)at> |
| Cc: | Srinath Reddy Sadipiralla <srinath2133(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Mihail Nikalayeu <mihailnikalayeu(at)gmail(dot)com>, Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Robert Treat <rob(at)xzilla(dot)net> |
| Subject: | Re: Adding REPACK [concurrently] |
| Date: | 2026-04-05 11:50:12 |
| Message-ID: | 202604051143.f5x6elmc7iut@alvherre.pgsql |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2026-Apr-05, Antonin Houska wrote:
> ok, maybe just skip the whole cleanup in that special case.
Hmm, should we make this test only in the db_specific case? Doing it
unconditionally makes me a bit nervous (maybe because I don't fully
understand historic snapshot building).
Anyway I just pushed the addition of a progress-suppression bit to
index_create() interface. Here's the rest of the series.
--
Álvaro Herrera Breisgau, Deutschland — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
"Ninguna manada de bestias tiene una voz tan horrible como la humana" (Orual)
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| v54-0001-Introduce-an-option-to-make-logical-replication-.patch | text/x-diff | 21.3 KB |
| v54-0002-Rename-cluster.c-h-repack.c-h.patch | text/x-diff | 7.8 KB |
| v54-0003-Add-CONCURRENTLY-option-to-REPACK-command.patch | text/x-diff | 174.3 KB |
| v54-0004-Error-out-any-process-that-would-block-at-REPACK.patch | text/x-diff | 11.8 KB |
| v54-0005-Reserve-replication-slots-specifically-for-REPAC.patch | text/x-diff | 27.8 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alexander Lakhin | 2026-04-05 12:00:00 | Re: pg_plan_advice |
| Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2026-04-05 11:47:30 | Re: [PROPOSAL] Termination of Background Workers for ALTER/DROP DATABASE |