| From: | Yugo Nagata <nagata(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp> |
|---|---|
| To: | jian he <jian(dot)universality(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Prevent internal error at concurrent CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION |
| Date: | 2025-05-26 18:17:51 |
| Message-ID: | 20250527031751.5434e5bcc383e0777b9c93eb@sraoss.co.jp |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, 23 May 2025 10:37:42 +0800
jian he <jian(dot)universality(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Thu, May 22, 2025 at 10:25 AM jian he <jian(dot)universality(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> hi.
> earlier, i didn't check patch 0002.
>
> i think in AlterFunction add
> /* Lock the function so nobody else can do anything with it. */
> LockDatabaseObject(ProcedureRelationId, funcOid, 0, AccessExclusiveLock);
>
> right after
> funcOid = LookupFuncWithArgs(stmt->objtype, stmt->func, false);
>
> should be fine.
Thank you. That makes sense because we can reduce redundant call of SearchSysCacheCopy1
and HeapTupleIsValid. I've attached a updated patch.
Regards,
Yugo Nagata
--
Yugo Nagata <nagata(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp>
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| v2-0002-Prevent-internal-error-at-concurrent-ALTER-FUNCTI.patch | text/x-diff | 1.7 KB |
| v2-0001-Prevent-internal-error-at-concurrent-CREATE-OR-RE.patch | text/x-diff | 2.8 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2025-05-26 19:36:14 | Re: Fixing memory leaks in postgres_fdw |
| Previous Message | Yugo Nagata | 2025-05-26 17:35:30 | Re: Prevent internal error at concurrent CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION |