Re: SLRU optimization - configurable buffer pool and partitioning the SLRU lock

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
To: Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Alexander Lakhin <exclusion(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Andrey M(dot) Borodin" <x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru>, tender wang <tndrwang(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Subject: Re: SLRU optimization - configurable buffer pool and partitioning the SLRU lock
Date: 2024-04-03 16:01:28
Message-ID: 202404031601.bdk3cws6o36x@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2024-Apr-03, Dilip Kumar wrote:

> Yeah, we missed acquiring the bank lock w.r.t. intervening pages,
> thanks for reporting. Your fix looks correct to me.

Thanks for the quick review! And thanks to Alexander for the report.
Pushed the fix.

--
Álvaro Herrera PostgreSQL Developer — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
"No hay hombre que no aspire a la plenitud, es decir,
la suma de experiencias de que un hombre es capaz"

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bertrand Drouvot 2024-04-03 16:27:45 Re: Introduce XID age and inactive timeout based replication slot invalidation
Previous Message Panda Developpeur 2024-04-03 15:49:41 Re: [PATCH] Modify pg_ctl to detect presence of geek user