| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)" <kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com> |
| Cc: | 'Euler Taveira' <euler(at)eulerto(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Shlok Kyal <shlok(dot)kyal(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com>, Fabrízio de Royes Mello <fabriziomello(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: speed up a logical replica setup |
| Date: | 2024-02-20 10:53:20 |
| Message-ID: | 202402201053.6jjvdrm7kahf@alvherre.pgsql |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2024-Feb-16, Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu) wrote:
> 15.
>
> You said in case of failure, cleanups is not needed if the process exits soon [1].
> But some functions call PQfinish() then exit(1) or pg_fatal(). Should we follow?
Hmm, but doesn't this mean that the server will log an ugly message that
"client closed connection unexpectedly"? I think it's nicer to close
the connection before terminating the process (especially since the
code for that is already written).
--
Álvaro Herrera PostgreSQL Developer — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
"We’ve narrowed the problem down to the customer’s pants being in a situation
of vigorous combustion" (Robert Haas, Postgres expert extraordinaire)
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrei Lepikhov | 2024-02-20 11:01:21 | Re: [POC] Allow flattening of subquery with a link to upper query |
| Previous Message | Matthias van de Meent | 2024-02-20 10:52:14 | Re: Add bump memory context type and use it for tuplesorts |