Re: remaining sql/json patches

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
To: Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Erik Rijkers <er(at)xs4all(dot)nl>, jian he <jian(dot)universality(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: remaining sql/json patches
Date: 2023-09-19 10:18:49
Message-ID: 202309191018.ahnhrmu4etvl@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

0001: I wonder why you used Node for the ErrorSaveContext pointer
instead of the specific struct you want. I propose the attached, for
some extra type-safety. Or did you have a reason to do it that way?

Álvaro Herrera Breisgau, Deutschland —
"How amazing is that? I call it a night and come back to find that a bug has
been identified and patched while I sleep." (Robert Davidson)

Attachment Content-Type Size
0001-0001-fixup-use-struct-ErrorSaveContext-not-Node.notpatch text/plain 4.3 KB

In response to


Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Aleksander Alekseev 2023-09-19 10:23:54 Re: Bug fix for psql's meta-command \ev
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2023-09-19 10:18:37 Re: Move bki file pre-processing from initdb to bootstrap