| From: | Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Maxim Orlov <orlovmg(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Add 'worker_type' to pg_stat_subscription |
| Date: | 2023-09-15 16:35:38 |
| Message-ID: | 20230915163538.GA1960964@nathanxps13 |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Sep 14, 2023 at 03:04:19PM -0700, Nathan Bossart wrote:
> The only reason I didn't apply this already is because IMHO we should
> adjust the worker types and the documentation for the view to be
> consistent. For example, the docs say "leader apply worker" but the view
> just calls them "apply" workers. The docs say "synchronization worker" but
> the view calls them "table synchronization" workers. My first instinct is
> to call apply workers "leader apply" workers in the view, and to call table
> synchronization workers "table synchronization workers" in the docs.
Concretely, like this.
--
Nathan Bossart
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| v7-0001-Add-worker-type-to-pg_stat_subscription.patch | text/x-diff | 7.2 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Daniel Gustafsson | 2023-09-15 17:50:51 | Re: Small patch modifying variable name to reflect the logic involved |
| Previous Message | Jonah H. Harris | 2023-09-15 16:24:47 | Re: Implement a column store for pg? |