| From: | Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Should we remove db_user_namespace? |
| Date: | 2023-07-05 21:29:27 |
| Message-ID: | 20230705212927.GA3518200@nathanxps13 |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Jul 03, 2023 at 04:20:39PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> I am on the side of +1'ing for the removal.
Here is a rebased version of the patch. So far no one has responded to the
pgsql-general thread [0], and no one here has argued for keeping this
parameter. I'm planning to bump the pgsql-general thread next week to give
folks one more opportunity to object.
[0] https://postgr.es/m/20230630215608.GD2941194%40nathanxps13
--
Nathan Bossart
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| v3-0001-remove-db_user_namespace.patch | text/x-diff | 8.0 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais | 2023-07-05 21:30:28 | [BUG] Fix DETACH with FK pointing to a partitioned table fails |
| Previous Message | Tristan Partin | 2023-07-05 21:06:46 | Re: Fix last unitialized memory warning |