| From: | Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, schneider(at)ardentperf(dot)com |
| Subject: | Re: monitoring usage count distribution |
| Date: | 2023-04-08 00:18:16 |
| Message-ID: | 20230408001816.GA519579@nathanxps13 |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Apr 07, 2023 at 02:29:31PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> I'm not sure if there is consensus for 0002, but I reviewed and pushed
> 0001. I made one non-cosmetic change: it no longer skips invalid
> buffers. Otherwise, the row for usage count 0 would be pretty useless.
> Also it seemed to me that sum(buffers) ought to agree with the
> shared_buffers setting.
Makes sense. Thanks!
--
Nathan Bossart
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andres Freund | 2023-04-08 00:19:42 | Re: cataloguing NOT NULL constraints |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2023-04-08 00:14:33 | Re: Is RecoveryConflictInterrupt() entirely safe in a signal handler? |