From: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz
Subject: Re: add PROCESS_MAIN to VACUUM
Date: 2023-03-06 22:43:10
Message-ID: 20230306224310.GA3165453@nathanxps13
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Mar 06, 2023 at 05:09:58PM -0500, Melanie Plageman wrote:
> I would move this comment inside of the outer if statement since it is
> distinguishing between the two branches of the inner if statement.

Oops, done.

> Also, I would still consider putting a comment above that reminds us that
> VACOPT_PROCESS_MAIN is the default and will vacuum the main relation.

I tried adding something along these lines.

Nathan Bossart
Amazon Web Services:

Attachment Content-Type Size
process_main_readability_fix_v2.patch text/x-diff 1.8 KB

In response to


Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Melanie Plageman 2023-03-06 23:12:36 Re: add PROCESS_MAIN to VACUUM
Previous Message Andres Freund 2023-03-06 22:29:50 Re: Use pg_pwritev_with_retry() instead of write() in dir_open_for_write() to avoid partial writes?