Re: Report checkpoint progress with pg_stat_progress_checkpoint (was: Report checkpoint progress in server logs)

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: "Drouvot, Bertrand" <bertranddrouvot(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Nitin Jadhav <nitinjadhavpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, Ashutosh Sharma <ashu(dot)coek88(at)gmail(dot)com>, Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Report checkpoint progress with pg_stat_progress_checkpoint (was: Report checkpoint progress in server logs)
Date: 2022-12-07 19:03:49
Message-ID: 20221207190349.garnd4zkbhfboouz@awork3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

On 2022-11-04 09:25:52 +0100, Drouvot, Bertrand wrote:
> Please find attached a rebase in v7.

cfbot complains that the docs don't build:
https://cirrus-ci.com/task/6694349031866368?logs=docs_build#L296

[03:24:27.317] ref/checkpoint.sgml:66: element para: validity error : Element para is not declared in para list of possible children

I've marked the patch as waitin-on-author for now.

There's been a bunch of architectural feedback too, but tbh, I don't know if
we came to any conclusion on that front...

Greetings,

Andres Freund

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jacob Champion 2022-12-07 19:06:07 Re: [PoC] Federated Authn/z with OAUTHBEARER
Previous Message Andres Freund 2022-12-07 18:59:43 Re: Partial aggregates pushdown