Re: use has_privs_of_role() for pg_hba.conf

From: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>, Joshua Brindle <joshua(dot)brindle(at)crunchydata(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: use has_privs_of_role() for pg_hba.conf
Date: 2022-10-07 19:44:30
Message-ID: 20221007194430.GA550749@nathanxps13
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Oct 07, 2022 at 03:34:51PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> Thanks. I would perhaps use names less generic than role{1,2,3} for
> the roles or "role1" for the database name, but the logic looks
> sound.

Here is a new version with more descriptive role names.

Nathan Bossart
Amazon Web Services:

Attachment Content-Type Size
v4-0001-Use-has_privs_of_role-for-samerole-samegroup-and-.patch text/x-diff 10.2 KB

In response to


Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2022-10-07 20:18:59 Re: use has_privs_of_role() for pg_hba.conf
Previous Message Tom Lane 2022-10-07 19:31:26 Re: Modernizing our GUC infrastructure