Quick Links

Re: Table AM and DROP TABLE [ Was: Table AM and DDLs]

From:	Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To:	Mats Kindahl <mats(at)timescale(dot)com>
Cc:	Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, Aleksander Alekseev <aleksander(at)timescale(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject:	Re: Table AM and DROP TABLE [ Was: Table AM and DDLs]
Date:	2022-10-02 16:53:01
Message-ID:	20221002165301.dbecafyvvfltgf47@awork3.anarazel.de
Views:	Raw Message \| Whole Thread \| Download mbox \| Resend email
Thread:
Lists:	pgsql-hackers

Hi,

The CF entry for this patch doesn't currently apply and there has been a bunch
of feedback on the approach. Mats, are you actually waiting for further
feedback right now?

Greetings,

Andres Freund

In response to

Re: Table AM and DROP TABLE [ Was: Table AM and DDLs] at 2022-07-29 10:36:13 from Mats Kindahl

Responses

Re: Table AM and DROP TABLE [ Was: Table AM and DDLs] at 2022-10-12 07:39:43 from Michael Paquier

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

	From	Date	Subject
Next Message	Andres Freund	2022-10-02 16:55:03	Re: Proposal for internal Numeric to Uint64 conversion function.
Previous Message	Andres Freund	2022-10-02 16:49:31	ssl tests aren't concurrency safe due to get_free_port()