| From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Anastasia Lubennikova <lubennikovaav(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> |
| Subject: | Re: CI and test improvements |
| Date: | 2022-10-02 01:36:41 |
| Message-ID: | 20221002013641.n7xkrd6yvuc4ackm@awork3.anarazel.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
On 2022-10-01 19:58:01 -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> One other thing is that your -m32 changes caused the linux/meson task to
> take an additional 3+ minutes (total ~8). That's no issue, except that
> the Warnings task depends on the linux/mason task, and itself can take
> up to 15 minutes.
> So those two potentially take as long as the windows task.
> I suggested that CompileWarnings could instead "Depend on: Freebsd",
> which currently takes 6-7min (and could take 4-5min if given more CPUs).
I am wondering if we should instead introduce a new "quickcheck" task that
just compiles and runs maybe one test and have *all* other tests depend on
that. Wasting a precious available windows instance to just fail to build or
immediately fail during tests doesn't really make sense.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andres Freund | 2022-10-02 01:49:58 | Re: Documentation building fails on HTTPS redirect (again) |
| Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2022-10-02 01:24:55 | Re: Eliminating SPI from RI triggers - take 2 |