Re: identifying the backend that owns a temporary schema

From: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: identifying the backend that owns a temporary schema
Date: 2022-09-26 16:08:22
Message-ID: 20220926160822.GA1298186@nathanxps13
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sat, Sep 24, 2022 at 01:41:38PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> One thing I don't like about it documentation-wise is that it leaves
> the concept of backend ID pretty much completely undefined.

How specific do you think this definition ought to be? All I've come up
with so far is "internal identifier for the backend that is independent
from its PID," which is what I used in the attached patch. Do we want to
mention its uses in more detail (e.g., temp schema name), or should we keep
it vague?

Nathan Bossart
Amazon Web Services:

Attachment Content-Type Size
v3-0001-Adjust-pg_stat_get_backend_-to-use-backends-PGPRO.patch text/x-diff 7.5 KB

In response to


Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Wolfgang Walther 2022-09-26 16:16:46 Re: has_privs_of_role vs. is_member_of_role, redux
Previous Message Zhang Mingli 2022-09-26 15:59:19 Add more docs for pg_surgery?