Re: postgres_fdw hint messages

From: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: postgres_fdw hint messages
Date: 2022-09-02 21:26:09
Message-ID: 20220902212609.GA1216541@nathanxps13
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Sep 01, 2022 at 04:31:20PM -0700, Nathan Bossart wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 01, 2022 at 07:08:49PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> (1) there probably needs to be some threshold of closeness, so we don't
>> offer "foobar" when the user wrote "huh"
>
> Agreed.
>
>> (2) there are several places doing this now, and there will no doubt
>> be more later, so we need to try to abstract the logic so it can be
>> shared.
>
> Will do.

Here is a new patch. Two notes:

* I considered whether to try to unite this new functionality with the
existing stuff in parse_relation.c, but the existing code looked a bit too
specialized.

* I chose a Levenshtein distance of 5 as the threshold of closeness for the
hint messages. This felt lenient, but it should hopefully still filter out
some of the more ridiculous suggestions. However, it's still little more
than a wild guess, so if folks think the threshold needs to be higher or
lower, I'd readily change it.

--
Nathan Bossart
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com

Attachment Content-Type Size
v2-0001-Adjust-assorted-hint-messages-that-list-all-valid.patch text/x-diff 16.7 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Melih Mutlu 2022-09-02 21:52:54 Re: Mingw task for Cirrus CI
Previous Message Peter Geoghegan 2022-09-02 21:13:15 Backpatching nbtree VACUUM (page deletion) hardening