Re: Improve description of XLOG_RUNNING_XACTS

From: Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com
Cc: ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com, ashutosh(dot)bapat(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Improve description of XLOG_RUNNING_XACTS
Date: 2022-07-28 07:29:32
Message-ID: 20220728.162932.298327366551709856.horikyota.ntt@gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

At Thu, 28 Jul 2022 15:53:33 +0900, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote in
> >
> Do you mean that both could be true at the same time? If I read
> GetRunningTransactionData() correctly, that doesn't happen.

So, I wrote "since it is debugging output", and "fine if we asuume the
record is sound". Is it any trouble with assuming the both *can*
happen at once? If something's broken, it will be reflected in the
output.

regards.

--
Kyotaro Horiguchi
NTT Open Source Software Center

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Langote 2022-07-28 07:37:08 Re: Skip partition tuple routing with constant partition key
Previous Message Kyotaro Horiguchi 2022-07-28 07:27:14 Re: Refactoring postgres_fdw/connection.c