From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Use -fvisibility=hidden for shared libraries |
Date: | 2022-07-18 22:09:38 |
Message-ID: | 20220718220938.5yx7if2mru3rd6jc@awork3.anarazel.de |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
On 2022-07-18 00:05:16 -0700, Andres Freund wrote:
> It looks like we might be missing out on benefiting from this on more
> platforms - the test right now is in the gcc specific section of configure.ac,
> but it looks like at least Intel's, sun's and AIX's compilers might all
> support -fvisibility with the same syntax.
>
> Given that that's just about all compilers we support using configure, perhaps
> we should just move that out of the compiler specific section? Doesn't look
> like there's much precedent for that so far...
Here's a potential patch along those lines.
I wonder if we also should move the -fno-strict-aliasing, -fwrapv tests
out. But that'd be something for later.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
v4-0001-configure-Check-if-fvisibility-is-supported-for-a.patch | text/x-diff | 13.6 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Nathan Bossart | 2022-07-18 22:17:10 | Re: allow specifying action when standby encounters incompatible parameter settings |
Previous Message | Nathan Bossart | 2022-07-18 21:56:49 | Re: pg_parameter_aclcheck() and trusted extensions |