| From: | Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu> |
| Cc: | Alexander Pyhalov <a(dot)pyhalov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, 李杰(慎追) <adger(dot)lj(at)alibaba-inc(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, 曾文旌(义从) <wenjing(dot)zwj(at)alibaba-inc(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY on partitioned index |
| Date: | 2022-03-25 13:13:55 |
| Message-ID: | 20220325131355.GC28503@telsasoft.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Mar 25, 2022 at 01:05:49AM -0400, Greg Stark wrote:
> This patch is marked "waiting on author" in the CF. However the most
> recent emails have patches and it's not clear to me what's left from
> previous reviews that might not be addressed yet. Should this patch be
> marked "Needs Review"?
>
> Anastasia and Alexander are marked as reviewers. Are you still able to
> review it or are there still pending issues that need to be resolved
> from previous reviews?
I still haven't responded to Alexander's feedback, so I need to do that.
(Sorry).
However, since the patch attracted no attention for 50 some weeks last year, so
now is a weird time to shift attention to it. As such, I will move it to the
next CF.
--
Justin
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bharath Rupireddy | 2022-03-25 13:21:08 | Re: pg_relation_size on partitioned table |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2022-03-25 13:08:32 | Re: automatically generating node support functions |