| From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | David Christensen <david(at)pgguru(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Cary Huang <cary(dot)huang(at)highgo(dot)ca> |
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] Proof of concept for GUC improvements |
| Date: | 2022-03-22 19:04:06 |
| Message-ID: | 20220322190406.7hpvvbhtk2curnvt@alap3.anarazel.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2022-03-22 13:15:34 -0500, David Christensen wrote:
> > On Mar 21, 2022, at 7:53 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> > If we'd done it like this from the beginning, it'd have been
> > great, but retrofitting it now is a lot less appealing.
>
> Yeah, agreed on this. As far as I’m concerned we can reject.
Updated CF entry to say so...
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2022-03-22 19:04:37 | Re: LockAcquireExtended() dontWait vs weaker lock levels than already held |
| Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2022-03-22 19:01:36 | Re: LockAcquireExtended() dontWait vs weaker lock levels than already held |