Re: Deparsing rewritten query

From: Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, Gilles Darold <gilles(at)darold(dot)net>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Deparsing rewritten query
Date: 2022-02-02 14:12:31
Message-ID: 20220202141231.rlogsu3t33ky6db7@jrouhaud
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

On Wed, Feb 02, 2022 at 07:09:35PM +0530, Bharath Rupireddy wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 1, 2022 at 9:08 AM Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
>
> Thanks. +1 for this work. Some comments on v3:
>
> 1) How about pg_get_rewritten_query()?

Argh, I just realized that I sent the patch from the wrong branch. Per
previous complaint from Tom, I'm not proposing that function anymore (I will
publish an extension for that if the patch gets commits) but only expose
get_query_def().

I'm attaching the correct patch this time, sorry about that.

Attachment Content-Type Size
v3-0001-Expose-get_query_def.patch text/plain 3.1 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Julien Rouhaud 2022-02-02 14:16:30 Re: Deparsing rewritten query
Previous Message Julien Rouhaud 2022-02-02 14:08:52 Re: Schema variables - new implementation for Postgres 15