| From: | Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Is ssl_crl_file "SSL server cert revocation list"? |
| Date: | 2021-12-02 04:54:41 |
| Message-ID: | 20211202.135441.590555657708629486.horikyota.ntt@gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
As discussed in the thread [1], I find the wording "SSL server
certificate revocation list" as misleading or plain wrong.
I used to read it as "SSL server certificate (of PostgreSQL client)
revocation list" but I find it misleading-ish from fresh eyes. So I'd
like to propose a change of the doc as attached.
What do you think about this?
[1] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20211202.134619.1052008069537649171.horikyota.ntt%40gmail.com
regards.
--
Kyotaro Horiguchi
NTT Open Source Software Center
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| fix_crl_doc.patch | text/x-patch | 2.6 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2021-12-02 04:57:44 | Re: pg_waldump stucks with options --follow or -f and --stats or -z |
| Previous Message | Amit Kapila | 2021-12-02 04:50:16 | Re: Data is copied twice when specifying both child and parent table in publication |