| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>, Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, "Bossart, Nathan" <bossartn(at)amazon(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Isn't it better with "autovacuum worker...." instead of "worker took too long to start; canceled" specific to "auto |
| Date: | 2021-11-22 16:25:45 |
| Message-ID: | 202111221625.ukj6wq4fuavn@alvherre.pgsql |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2021-Oct-28, Bharath Rupireddy wrote:
> Thanks all for reviewing this. Here's the CF entry -
> https://commitfest.postgresql.org/35/3378/
Thanks, pushed. I changed a couple of things though -- notably changed
the elog() to ereport() as suggested by Nathan early on, but never
materialized in the submitted patch. I also changed the wording of the
context names, since the proposed ones weren't much more satisfactory
than the existing ones.
--
Álvaro Herrera 39°49'30"S 73°17'W — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
"Every machine is a smoke machine if you operate it wrong enough."
https://twitter.com/libseybieda/status/1541673325781196801
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Chapman Flack | 2021-11-22 16:37:53 | Re: Is a function to a 1-component record type undeclarable? |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2021-11-22 16:15:23 | Re: Is a function to a 1-component record type undeclarable? |