Re: FETCH FIRST clause PERCENT option

From: Jaime Casanova <jcasanov(at)systemguards(dot)com(dot)ec>
To: David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>
Cc: Surafel Temesgen <surafel3000(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Vik Fearing <vik(dot)fearing(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Ryan Lambert <ryan(at)rustprooflabs(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: FETCH FIRST clause PERCENT option
Date: 2021-09-28 15:58:53
Message-ID: 20210928155853.GA5821@ahch-to
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Mar 25, 2021 at 11:15:10AM -0400, David Steele wrote:
> On 1/26/21 11:29 AM, Surafel Temesgen wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 2:39 PM Kyotaro Horiguchi
> > <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com <mailto:horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>> wrote:
> >
> > Sorry for the dealy. I started to look this.
> >
> > Hi kyotaro,
> > Thanks for looking into this but did we agree to proceed
> > on this approach? I fear that it will be the west of effort if
> > Andrew comes up with the patch for his approach.
> > Andrew Gierth: Are you working on your approach?
> [Added Andrew to recipients]
> Andrew, would you care to comment?

Hi everyone,

This is still marked as needs review, but I think it should be marked
as "Returned with feedback" or "waiting on author".


Jaime Casanova
Director de Servicios Profesionales
SystemGuards - Consultores de PostgreSQL

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2021-09-28 16:50:11 Re: [BUG] failed assertion in EnsurePortalSnapshotExists()
Previous Message Rachel Heaton 2021-09-28 15:52:59 Re: [PATCH] Print error when libpq-refs-stamp fails