From: | Yugo NAGATA <nagata(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp> |
---|---|
To: | Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Avoid stuck of pbgench due to skipped transactions |
Date: | 2021-06-14 02:20:37 |
Message-ID: | 20210614112037.b2963e40ac0a2031a7a9983d@sraoss.co.jp |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hello Fabien,
On Sun, 13 Jun 2021 08:56:59 +0200 (CEST)
Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr> wrote:
> > I attached a patch for this fix.
>
> The patch mostly works for me, and I agree that the bench should not be in
> a loop on any parameters, even when "crazy" parameters are given…
>
> However I'm not sure this is the right way to handle this issue.
>
> The catch-up loop can be dropped and the automaton can loop over itself to
> reschedule. Doing that as the attached fixes this issue and also makes
> progress reporting work proprely in more cases, and reduces the number of
> lines of code. I did not add a test case because time sensitive tests have
> been removed (which is too bad, IMHO).
I agree with your way to fix. However, the progress reporting didn't work
because we cannot return from advanceConnectionState to threadRun and just
break the loop.
+ /* otherwise loop over PREPARE_THROTTLE */
break;
I attached the fixed patch that uses return instead of break, and I confirmed
that this made the progress reporting work property.
Regards,
Yugo Nagata
--
Yugo NAGATA <nagata(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp>
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
pgbench-stuck-3.patch | text/x-diff | 1.9 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | David Rowley | 2021-06-14 02:28:50 | Re: An out-of-date comment in nodeIndexonlyscan.c |
Previous Message | tsunakawa.takay@fujitsu.com | 2021-06-14 02:04:31 | RE: Transactions involving multiple postgres foreign servers, take 2 |