Re: pg_stat_statements oddity with track = all

From: Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
Cc: Sergei Kornilov <sk(at)zsrv(dot)org>, legrand legrand <legrand_legrand(at)hotmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_stat_statements oddity with track = all
Date: 2021-04-08 14:54:09
Message-ID: 20210408145409.ajsmohzsa6gbcisx@nol
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Apr 08, 2021 at 03:18:09PM +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 8, 2021 at 2:04 PM Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> > If yes, PFA a patch to merge 1.10 in 1.9.
> I actually thought I looked at that, but clearly I was confused one
> way or another.
> I think you're right, it's cleaner to merge it into 1.9, so applied and pushed.

Thanks Magnus!

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Steele 2021-04-08 14:55:17 Re: [BUG] orphaned function
Previous Message Jaime Casanova 2021-04-08 14:49:18 Re: maximum columns for brin bloom indexes